How Well-Intentioned Measures Have Unintended Consequences for Election Turnout
            BIG-DATA-BASED ECONOMIC INSIGHTS
      
	Key Messages
- Reassigning citizens to vote at a different polling place causes a persistent shift from in-person to mail-in voting and a transitory drop in total turnout
- The turnout loss is driven by inattentive voters, who miss the deadline for requesting a mail-in ballot
- The effects are more driven by the reassignment itself and less by the changes in distance to the polling location
- Explicit notification about polling place reassignments could prevent losses in turnout
Abstract
              Well-intentioned measures such as polling place reassignments can have unintend-ed consequences, such as a shift from in-person to postal voting and a temporary decline in overall voter turnout. The drop in turnout is due to inattentive voters missing the deadline to apply for an absentee ballot.
Series
              
          Links
          
      Citation
              Jean-Victor Alipour and Valentin Lindlacher: “How Well-Intentioned Measures Have Unintended Consequences for Election Turnout,” EconPol Forum 25 (4), CESifo, Munich, 2024.
